ALGORITHMIC BIAS AND THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY: REIMAGINING CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  • Mr. P.D. Sujith B.E., M.B.A., LL.B., LL.M., PhD Scholar, Assistant Professor (Law), School of Law, Hindustan Institute of Science and Technology
  • Dr. VR Dinkar LLM PhD - Dean - School of Law - Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v11i2.6403
Keywords: Algorithmic Bias, Artificial Intelligence, Equality, Discrimination, Indian Constitution, AI Regulation, Technology Law

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming governance, employment, and legal systems. Yet, algorithmic bias, when AI systems systematically disadvantage certain groups poses a threat to the constitutional guarantee of equality. This paper investigates how AI can unintentionally reinforce discrimination, examines Indian constitutional provisions (Articles 14–18), and proposes a legal-ethical framework to ensure algorithmic accountability. Drawing on global best practices, the study suggests constitutional, statutory, and judicial reforms to balance innovation with justice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2025-08-07
How to Cite
Mr. P.D. Sujith, & Dr. VR Dinkar. (2025). ALGORITHMIC BIAS AND THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY: REIMAGINING CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. IJRDO - Journal of Business Management, 11(2), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v11i2.6403
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): IJRDO-Journal of Business Management (ISSN: 2455-6661)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By submitting a manuscript to IJRDO – Journal of Business Management, the author(s) confirm that the work is original and does not infringe upon any existing copyrights or third-party rights.

Authors retain responsibility for the content of their work. In cases of proven ethical misconduct such as plagiarism or duplicate publication, the journal reserves the right to take appropriate action, which may include correction or retraction, in accordance with publication ethics.