A Study on Hindrance of Customs Procedures to Taiwan’s Development of Free Trade Zones

  • Cheng-Chung Cho HungKuo Delin University of Technology
  • Fu- Chiang Yang HungKuo Delin University of Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v3i11.1516
Keywords: Customs Procedures, Free Trade Zones, Taiwan

Abstract

This study investigated the hindrance of customs procedures to the development of free
trade zones in Taiwan, attempted to identify the hindrances and proposed solutions through
literature reviews and field research. Through literature reviews and field research, this study
found that: a. customs procedures impede the liberalization of international logistics in free trade
zones., b. the coexistence of business in existing development areas and same business in free
trade zones impedes customs management; c. customs is inflexible in thinking and rules and is
not easily subject to autonomous management; d. unsimplified customs procedures are one of the
major obstacles to the development of free trade zone in Taiwan; e. the Customs Administration,
the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, and non-governmental enterprises have
different attitudes towards autonomous management of security guards and audit mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cheng-Chung Cho, HungKuo Delin University of Technology

Assistant professor, Department of Business Administration

Fu- Chiang Yang, HungKuo Delin University of Technology

Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration

Published
2017-11-30
How to Cite
Cho, C.-C., & Yang, F.- C. (2017). A Study on Hindrance of Customs Procedures to Taiwan’s Development of Free Trade Zones. IJRDO - Journal of Business Management, 3(11), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v3i11.1516
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 11 (2017): IJRDO - Journal of Business Management
Section
Articles

By submitting a manuscript to IJRDO – Journal of Business Management, the author(s) confirm that the work is original and does not infringe upon any existing copyrights or third-party rights.

Authors retain responsibility for the content of their work. In cases of proven ethical misconduct such as plagiarism or duplicate publication, the journal reserves the right to take appropriate action, which may include correction or retraction, in accordance with publication ethics.