Non-audit Fees and Auditor Independence: Supply Side Considerations Initial audit fee discounting and the supply of NAS
Abstract
The joint provision of audit and non-audit services remains a contentious issue for the regulators, legislators and the auditing profession to date. In the past two decades, audit research has examined whether the joint provision of audit and non-audit services impairs auditor independence. However, empirical evidence on non-audit services and auditor independence has remained mixed and inconclusive. This paper seeks to contribute to debate on the joint supply of audit and non-audit services by empirically investigating the supply side of the market for non-audit services. In particular, a model for the supply side of the market for non-audit services is developed and empirically tested. A supply side focus can be potentially informative because the reason why auditors supply non-audit services to their audit clients can have important implications for the independence of the auditor. An ordinary least squares regression model is used to model the supply side of the market for non-audit services. In addition, a panel dataset is used. The data relates to a sample of the companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange from the year 2000 to 2010. The results of this study indicate that auditors supply non-audit services to audit clients for efficiency rather than opportunistic reasons. This study provides regulators and legislators in Australia with important insights into the supply of non-audit services by incumbent auditors to their audit clients.
Downloads
References
Abbott, L.; Parker, S.; Peters, G.; Rama, D. V. 2003. Audit, non-audit and information technology fees: Some empirical evidence. Accounting and the Public Interest(3): 1-20.Arnett, H., and P. Danos. 1979. CPA firm viability. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Asanuma, B. 1989. Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 3 (1): 1-30.Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R. and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review78: 611-639.Ashton, A. H. 1991. Experience and error frequency knowledge as potential determinants of audit expertise. The Accounting Review 66 (2): 218-39.Butterworth, S., and K. Houghton. 1995. Auditor switching: The pricing of audit services. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting22 (3): 323-344.Christodoulou, M. 2010. Big-Four-only clauses are rare. Accountancy Age(June 18).Chung, H.; Kallapur, S. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review78.Craswell, A. T., and J. R. Francis. 1999. Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: A Test of Competing Theories. The Accounting Review74 (2): 201-216.Craswell, Allen T. 1999. Does the Provision of Non-Audit Services Impair Auditor Independence? International Journal of Auditing3: 29
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence, “low balling”, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics(August): 113-127. DeFond, M.L., Raghunandan, K. and Subramanyam, K.R. 2002. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research(September): 1247-1274. Dunmore, P., and Shao, Y. 2006. Audit and Non Audit Fees: New Zealand Evidence. PacificAccounting Review18 (2): 33-46.Dye, R. 1991. Informationally motivated auditor replacement, Journal of Accounting and Economics(December): 347-374.Elitzur, R., and H. Falk. 1996. Auctions for audit services and low-balling. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (Supplement): 41-59.Ettredge, M., and R. Greenberg. 1990. Determinants of Fee Cutting on Initial Audit Engagements. Journal of Accounting Research28 (1): 198-210.Ezzamel, M., D. R. Gwilliam, and K. M. Holland. 1996. Some empirical evidence from publicly quoted companies on the relationship between the pricing of audit and non-audit services. Accounting and Business Research27(1): 3-16.Ferguson, Michael J. 2004. Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management: U.K. Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 21: 813.Firth, M. 1997. The provision of non-audit services by accounting firms to their audit Clients. Contemporary Accounting Research. 17 (2): 1-21.Francis, J. R. 2004. What do we know about audit quality? British Accounting Review36 (4): 345-368.
By submitting a manuscript to IJRDO – Journal of Business Management, the author(s) confirm that the work is original and does not infringe upon any existing copyrights or third-party rights.
Authors retain responsibility for the content of their work. In cases of proven ethical misconduct such as plagiarism or duplicate publication, the journal reserves the right to take appropriate action, which may include correction or retraction, in accordance with publication ethics.
This work is licensed under a 