POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Abstract
This is an area where there is considerable disagreement on the definition of concepts, and what is right and wrong. Accordingly you should read widely and critically; never assume that you need to accept every concept and every assertion. You will probably be able to find an exception to every rule (see Feyer bend, 1975, for an extreme version of this principle).
These notes are intended as a brief overview of the main issues. It is important that you read in more depth on the specific issues of particular concern to you. For example, if you intend to conduct some interviews or a questionnaire survey, it is important that you consult a suitable source of guidance on surveys, interviews and questionnaires – eg Saunders et al (2003), Robson (2002), Easterby-Smith et al (2002).
Downloads
References
Easterby Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management Research: an introduction (2nd edition). London: Sage.
Easterby Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (1991). Management Research: an introduction. London: Sage.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: an outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746-750.
Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (1991). Research Methods for Managers. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Harding, S., & Long, T. (1998). MBA management models. Aldershot: Gower.
Huff, D. (1973). How to lie with statistics. Penguin.
Husserl, E. (1946). Phenomenology in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th edition, Vol 17, 699 702.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value focused thinking: a path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
McGoldrick, P. M., & Greenland, S. J. (1992). Competition between banks and building societies. British Journal of Management, 3, 169 172.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd edition). London: Sage.
Oakland, J. S. (1986). Statistical process control. London: Heinemann.
Oakland, J (1989). Total Quality Management. Oxford, Heinemann Professional.
Pidd, M. (1996). Tool for thinking: modelling in management science. Chichester: Wiley.
Pidd, M. (2003). Tool for thinking: modelling in management science (2nd edition). Chichester: Wiley.
Plato (1956). Meno (trans: Guthrie, W K C). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Popper, K. (1978). Conjectures and Refutations. London: R.K.P.
Quinn, J B; Mintzberg, H; James, R M (1988). The strategy process: concepts, contexts and cases. Prentice Hall.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
Rosenhead, J. (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for uncertainty, complexity and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Russell, Bertrand (1961). History of Western Philosophy. George Allen & Unwin.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students (3rd edition). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Stein, S. D. (1999). Learning, teaching and researching on the internet: a practical guide for social scientists. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Thorpe, R., & Moscarola, J. (1991). Detecting your research strategy. Management Education and Development, 22(2), 127 133.
Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning. Bern and Stuttgart: Haupt.
Wood, M. (2003). Making sense of statistics: a non-mathematical approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
