THE POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE R-ARCSS 2018, ON POWER SHARINGS
Abstract
The paper investigates and analyses the Revitalized Agreement for the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan(R-ARCSS) which was signed on September, 12th 2018, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The agreement contains eight chapters and four annex, the paper focuses in analyzing the powers sharing chapter, which emphasizes a lot on power-sharing of different partners and signatories of the agreement including governmental, political parties among others, sharing of powers in percentage which SPLM/A ( ITGONU) 55%, SPLM/A ( IO)27%, SSOA= 10%, OPP= 8%, FDs= (0%), and participation of women’s should not be less than 35% in all governance level. It approximately (4,505) positions, headlined by president and five vice president, National Council of Ministers, National legislation Assembly and states governments, some was formed as government of transitional” period from all signatories, based on inclusivity. The parties also recognizes that Federal system of government is popular demand of people of South Sudan and democratic system of government within the permanent constitution-making process, and all this percentages will be dissolve after the interim period of three years started in 2018 and election should be done in 2021 . The chapter two is facing key tasks prior to the government’s formation would be training and unifying a new national army from among the armed groups and resolving the disputes over the number and boundaries of states to pave the way for local power sharing.
In addition, the paper illustrates, observations, challenges and recommendation which may contribute on efforts of other scholars in the same filed of political analyses and issues related to power sharing in the region.
Downloads
References
- - RJMEC Secretariat, (2018), Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
- - High-Level Committee for the Establishment of State and Local Government Structures and Responsibility Sharing, (oct 27, 2020), Juba, South Sudan.
- JMEC, (17 August 2015), Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
- Peter Adwok Nyaba, (2019), South Sudan, Elites, Ethnicity, Endless Wars and the Stunted State.
- Johnson, Douglas H. (2010), When Boundaries Become Borders, The Impact of Boundary-making in Southern Sudan's Frontier Zones. Rift Valley Institute. Pg. 22
- "Sudan: History of a Broken Land."(4 Jan. 2011), AJE - Al Jazeera English. Web. 16July2011.<http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/general/2011/01/201114134128212 12.html>.
- Deng, Francis M. (2006), "Sudan: A Nation in Turbulent Search of Itself." The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 603.(1) 155-62. Pg. 156.
- International Crisis Groups, (13 March 2019), Salvaging South Sudan’s Fragile Peace Deal, Africa Report N°270.
- James Okuk, (2019). Peace of South Sudan and Revitalization, Nairobi- Kenya, the Catholic University of Eastern Africa.
- Aleyomi, M. B. (2013) Intra-Party Conflicts in South Sudan: The Case Study of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 15(4): pp. 281, 296.
Copyright (c) 2021 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.