Specific Aspects of Neurophysiological and Neuroimaging Study of Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Spasticity

  • Nataliia Domres Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #4
  • Larysa Sokolova O.O . Bogomolets National Medical University
Keywords: spasticity, multiple sclerosis, M-amplitude, electrophysiologic phenomena, lesions

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the functional state of muscle fibers in spasticity and prognostic value of the number and localization of MRI lesions for its development in MS patients. Material and methods. We studied findings of electroneuromyography in 51 multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity. The study was performed using non-invasive stimulation technique with a Nihon Kohden device. Results. In patients with MS with minimal clinical signs of spasticity, a significant decrease in the amplitude of the M-response was revealed when examining both the upper and lower extremities. Indicators of late electrophysiological phenomena (F-wave) changed only in the lower limbs, where the level of spasticity was higher. We identified threshold levels of M-amplitude to assess the risk of developing a high spasticity score of >12. The number of T2 and T1 lesions, as well as their localization in the spinal cord, have prognostic value for early development of spasticity. Conclusion. The results of the study revealed the main electrophysiological indicators of early manifestations of spasticity in MS patients and prognostic value of the number and localization of MRI lesions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Barnes M.P. Kent R.M., Semlyen J.K. et al. Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis. // Neurorehabilitation and Natural Repair. — 2003. — Vol. 17. — P. 66-67.
2. Belgin Petek Balci. Spasticity Measurement. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018; 55 (Suppl 1): S49–S53. doi: 10.29399/npa.23339, PMCID: PMC6278623, PMID: 30692856
3. Damiano D.L., Quinlivan J.M. Owen B.F. et al. What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? // Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. — 2002. — Vol. 44. — P. 112-118.
4. Drovy V., Neufeld M. Y., Korczyn A. D. E. F-wave characteristics following acute and chronic upper motor neuron lesions // Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. – 2003. – Vol. 33, Issue 7. – P. 441–446.
5. Erick A. Grana, MD, George H. Kraft, Electrodiagnostic Abnormalities in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. -- 1994 – Vol. 75 – P.778-782.
6. Hemmett L, Holmes J, Barnes M, Russell N. What drives quality of life in multiple sclerosis? // QJM. — 2004. — Vol. 97. — P. 671–676.
7. Hoang P.D. Spasticity and Multiple Sclerosis. // MS Practice (Australia). – June 2009. – P. 4 — 8.
8. Hobart J.C., Cano S.J., Zajicek J.P. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. // Lancet Neurology. — 2007. — Vol. 6(12). — P. 1094-1105.
9. Kohan A.H., Abootalebi S., Khoshnevisan A. et al. Comparison of Modified Ashworth Scale and Hoffmann Reflex in Study of Spasticity. // Acta Medica Iranica. — 2010.— Vol. 48(3). — P. 154-157.
10. Pandyan A.D., Price C.I.M., Barnes M.P. A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity. // Clinical Rehabilitation. — 2003. — Vol. 17, No. 3. — P. 290-294.
11. Pandyan, A.D., Gregoric, M., Barnes, M. P., et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. // Disability and Rehabilitation. — 2005. — Vol. 5. — P. 4-14.
12. Patejdl R., Zettl U.K. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Contribution of inflammation, autoimmune mediated neuronal damage and therapeutic interventions. // Autoimmun Rev. — 2017. — Sep;16(9). — P. 925-936.
13. Schapiro, RT. Managing the Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis. // Demos Health; 5th edition. — 2007. — 192 p.
14. Serafin B. Managing the Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis, 5th edition [Електронний ресурс] / Serafin B // Department of Neurorehabilitation, Valens Clinic Rehabilitation Center. – 2014. – Режим доступу до ресурсу: https://www.excemed.org/ms-alumni/resources/management-spasticity-multiple-sclerosis-ms.
15. Voerman GE, Gregoric M, Hermens HJ. Neurophysiological methods for the assessment of spasticity:The Hoffmann reflex, the tendon reflex, and the stretch reflex. Disabil Rehabil. — 2005. — Vol. 27. — P. 33–68.
16. Zavalishin I.A., Barhatova V.P., Shitikova I.E. Spasticheskiy parez [Spastic Paresis] // Rasseyannyi skleroz [Multiple Sclerosis]. — 2000. — P. 436—455.
Published
2020-09-10
How to Cite
Domres, N., & Sokolova, L. (2020). Specific Aspects of Neurophysiological and Neuroimaging Study of Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Spasticity. IJRDO -JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND NURSING, 5(8), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v5i8.3840