ASSESSING TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESSES THROUGH REFLECTIVE LEARNING JOURNAL
A Classroom Action Research on the 11th Graders of SMA Dharma Karya UT, South Tangerang, Indonesia
Abstract
In TEFL, the processes of both teaching and learning play prominent roles toward the successfulness of the students’ achievements. Thus, these processess should be assessed and the assessment coming from the students’ sides will help the teachers to see the real problems faced by their students. The purpose of this classroom action research is to describe students’ reflections on the processess of teaching and learning through reflective learning journal. Total number of 19 students of 11th grade of Senior High School Dharma Karya UT, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia, participated in this study. The research was conducted in 2 cycles and each cycle consisted of 2 meetings and each meeting covered 2 learning hours (2 x 45 minutes). Reflective learning journal writing was used as the instrument in collecting the data. It was distributed to the students before the treatment and after. The results of the study were analysed by using RMIT reflective cycle (2006) in which the writers only focused on the ‘reflection’ domain. The findings revealed that before the treatments, the students put negative reflections on English teaching and learning process. While after the treatments, their reflections were strongly positives.
Downloads
References
Fenwick, T., & Parsons, J. (2000). Toolbox 2: Assessing learner journals. From The Art of Evaluation: A handbook for educators and trainers. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing, Inc. pp. 155-161.
Fortson, A. & Sisk, R. (2007). “Reflective journaling as assessment and teaching”. Assessment design for learner responsibility, http://www.reap.ac.uk., retrieved on: Oct 3, 2018.
Khanjani, A., et.al. (2018), “Effects of journal writing on EFL teacher trainees’ reflective practice”. Research in language pedagogy., Vol. 6 (1), Pp. 56 – 77.
Letch, N. (2012). “Using reflective journals to engage students in learning business process management concepts”. Knowledge Management & E-learning: An International Journal, Vol. 4 (4), Pp. 435-454.
Munawaroh. (2017). “The influence of teaching methods and learning environment to the student’s learning achievement of craft and entrepreneurship subjects at vocational high school”. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, Vo. 12(94), Pp. 665-678.
Plack, et.al. (2005). “A method for assessing reflective journal writing”. Journal of Allied Health, Vol. 34 (4), Pp. 199-208, retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net, on Oct 2, 2018.
RMIT University, Study and Learning Centre. (2006). “Reflective Journals”. http://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/Isu/content/2_AssessmentTask/assess_tuts/reflective%20jpurnal_LL/index.html. , accessed on: Oct 5th, 2018.
Stevens, D., & Cooper, J. (2009). Journal keeping: How to use reflective writing for effective learning, teaching, professional insight, and positive change. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publications.
Spaulding, E. & Wilson, A. (2002). “Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflected journal writing. Teachers College Record, Vol. 104 (7), Pp. 1303 – 1421.
Varner, D. & Peck, S. (2003). “Learning from learning journals: The benefits and challenges of using learning journal assignments. Journal of Management Education, Vol. 27 (1), Pp. 52-77.
Williams, N. (2018). Reflective journal writing as an alternative assessment. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net, on Oct 5, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2020 IJRDO - Journal of Educational Research (ISSN: 2456-2947)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.