DETERMINANTS OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AMONG MATURE ENTRY STUDENTS: A CASE OF NAKURU AND NAIROBI CAMPUSES OF KENYA METHODIST UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Globally, universities are recording a greater mix of students currently more than in the past. The purpose of the study was to investigate the social factors and how it impacts on academic performance among mature age entry students. The study was guided by the Needs theory by Abraham Maslow and adopted descriptive survey research design. The total target population was all the 289 mature age entry students enrolled at Nakuru and Nairobi campuses of Kenya Methodist University, administrators, Chairmen of Departments and lecturers of the two campuses. Convenient sampling was applied to obtain a sample size of 100 mature age entry students who participated in the study. University administrators were purposefully sampled based on the information required for the study. Questionnaire and interview schedules were used for collecting data for the study. In the study, the researcher carried out a pilot study and then carefully analyzed the results for clarity, correctness and also ensured that the items were comprehensive as far as the coverage of objectives was concerned. In order to ensure smooth research procedures, various ethical issues such as anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent were observed. The data from the questionnaires were edited, coded and entered into the computer for analysis. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used in analyzing the data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23 using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results are presented in tables and charts to enhance clarity. Finally, the study found out that current engagement, inability to fit in university programmes and inability to balance demands of mature age entry students affect their academic performance. The universities should develop academic programmes that help reduce conflict that mature age students’ encounter with their jobs and family commitments. This would involve revising the calendar for this category of students and also introduce weekend and evening classes where possible.
Downloads
References
Cantwell (2001). Mature students in danger: An evaluation of the survival of older hospitality management undergraduates. Hospitality Management 18(1)
Child, D. (2001).Psychology and the teacher, London: Continuum
Chitavi, M.J. (2002). Guidance and Counseling Series – School Administration,
Nairobi: Pavement Publishers.
Common Wealth Dep’t of Education (2012). Experiencing the barriers: Non-traditional
students entering higher education. Research Papers in Education.5 (12)24-27
Davies et.al.(2002). ‘They Talk About People Like Me’ Non-Traditional Entrants in
Higher Education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Davies &William (2001). A Comparison of the Academic Experiences and Achievement of University Students Entering by Traditional and Non-traditional Means. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3) 22-26
Geiser and Studley (2003). . Urban vs. Rural schools. What test data really tells us? Valley Press Media NY.
Kantanis, T. (1999). The Role of Programme Cohesion in Affecting Smooth Transition from Secondary School to University.
Leatthwood & O’Connel(2003). For Me or Not for Me? That is the Question: A Study of Mature Students’ Decision Making. Research Brief 297 for Department for Education and Employment, London.
Leder & Fogasz(2004). Build your own rainbow: a workbook for career and life management. (4th Ed.). Cirencester: Management Books 2000 Ltd.
Mc Cune et.al (2010). The experience of mature students. Studies in Higher Education, 1(2) 45-48
Mugenda, O. & Mugenda, A. (2003).Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative
Approaches. Nairobi: Act Press.
Mohammad,Y.H.S and Alhameed,M.A (1988). An evaluation of traditional admission
Standards in predicting Kuwait University students’ academic outcomes. Higher education Vol.17, No.2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands
Nelson (2002). SPLASH: The First Year Experience Project. University of Surrey.
Pedrosa, Norberto, Rafael, Cibele and Benilton (2006). Educational and social economic background of undergraduates and academic outcomes: consequences for affirmative action programs at a Brazilian research university\: http://www.comvest.unicamp.br/paals/artigo2.pdf
Reay’s(2002). For Me or Not For Me? Fragility and Risk in Mature Students’ Decision-making. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2).
Saunders, A. (1994). Evaluation of the assessment strategy for admission at Pretoria
University. Retrieved on Oct. 14, 2015
http://hagar.up.ac.za/catts/learner/andres/assess.html 10/14/2015
Shanahan(2000). Access and assets: The experiences of mature mother students in higher education. Journal of Access Studies, 5(2).
Terenzini, P.T. (1994). ‘The Transition to College: Diverse Students, Diverse Stories.’Tinto, V. (1993). (Second Edition).Chicago. The University of Chicago Press
Tones et. Al(2009). Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee –
Students and Universities Eleventh Report of Session 2008/09. London: Stationery Office.
Thomas(2002). Review of widening participation research: addressing the barriers to
participation in higher education. Report to HEFCE by the University of York, Higher Education Academy and Institute of Access Studies
Wiersman, W. (1995). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. Boston: Ally
and Bacon.
West, L. (1986). ‘Students Withdrawing from Fulltime Higher Education. HEARU:
Monash University
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
